Editorial: 2009 in review
نویسندگان
چکیده
Year 2009 was a banner year for Evolutionary Applications. Along with publishing four full issues (40 papers), the journal was fully indexed in ISI Web of Science, and was awarded the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) award for Best New Journal for 2009. We received 84 submissions, an over 20% increase from 2008. We published two special issues: Evolutionary Medicine, 2(1); and Towards Darwinian Fisheries Management, 2(3), and had an article featured as a Must Read in the Faculty of 1000 (Colautti et al. 2009). Although Evolutionary Applications was launched in 2008, papers published in the first 2 years have already been cited 370 times in over 90 different journals for an average citation per item of 3.75. Watch for our first impact factor which will be issued sometimes during 2010.
منابع مشابه
A Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملResponse to Industrial Wind Action Group Critiques
On November 20, 2009, the Industrial Wind Action Group (IWAG) posted an editorial that, in part, lists a number of concerns about Berkeley Lab’s efforts to investigate the presence of residential property value impacts associated with U.S. wind power facilities. 1 That editorial follows from more-extensive review comments provided on September 11, 2009 by the Industrial Wind Action Group. 2 The...
متن کاملThe EJIS editorial organisation and submissions
European Journal of Information Systems (2009) 18, 1–3. doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.3 In November, EJIS completed a ‘soft launch’ of our new online submission system. We expect this system to help improve our management of the submission review process and streamline the path from submission to publication. We are also increasing the number of associate editors, and introducing a ‘senior’ rank among ...
متن کاملThe Peer-Review and Editorial System: Ways to Fix Something That Might Be Broken.
The present article focuses on ways to make the peer-review and editorial process more efficient and more equitable for authors. In particular, we focus on the role of editors and action editors in the process of selecting and managing reviewers, balancing their own impressions of the manuscript with the reviewers' feedback, and rendering a fair and equitable editorial decision. We advance seve...
متن کاملAfter further review.
In the two years that I have been Editor in Chief of the JCI, the editors and I have sent approximately 2,500 papers for external review. The referee reports that we've received have spanned the spectrum from incredibly insightful to completely unhelpful. Together with a longer piece immediately following this editorial, I would like to reflect on what I think makes a good review.
متن کاملتاریخچه مرور همتایان سردبیری در چاپ مقالات علمی
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره شانزدهم، اسفند 1396، 1096-1095 تاریخچه مرور همتایان سردبیری در چاپ مقالات علمی The history of the editorial peer review in publication of scientific articles محسن رضائیان[1]،[2] چاپ مقالات علمی از سابقه نسبتاً دیرینهی 350 ساله برخوردار است[1]. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010